Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39054417›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Clinician care priorities and practices in the fourth trimester: perspective from a California survey.

Sylvia Guendelman, Serena Xinzi Wang, Maureen Lahiff, Lawrence Lurvey, Hayley E Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sylvia GuendelmanSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way, Room, 6124, Berkeley, Ca, 94720-7360, USA. sylviag@berkeley.edu.
Serena Xinzi WangSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley Class of 2025, 2121 Berkeley Way West, Berkeley, Ca, 94720-7360, USA.
Maureen LahiffSchool of Public Health, University of California, 2121 Berkeley Way, Room 5302, Berkeley, Ca, 94720-7360, USA.
Lawrence LurveyKaiser Permanente West Los Angeles, 6041 Cadillac Ave, Los Angeles, Ca, 90034, USA.
Hayley E MillerCenter for Academic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 453 Quarry Road, Palo Alto, Ca, 94305-5317, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional societies such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) promote the idea that postpartum care is an ongoing process where there is adequate opportunity to provide services and support. Nonetheless, in practice, the guidelines ask clinicians to perform more clinical responsibilities than they might be able to do with limited time and resources.

methodsWe conducted an online survey among practicing obstetric clinicians (obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), midwives, and family medicine doctors) in California about their priorities and care practices for the first postpartum visit and explored how they prioritize multiple clinical responsibilities within existing time and resources. Between September 2023 and February 2024, 174 out of 229 eligible participants completed the survey, a 76% response rate. From a list of care components, we used descriptive statistics to identify those that were highly prioritized by most clinicians and those that were considered a priority by very few and examined the alignment between prioritized components and recommended care practices.

resultsClinicians were highly invested in the care components that they rated as most important, indicating that they always check these components or assess them when they perceive patient need. Depression and anxiety, breast health/breast feeding issues, vaginal birth complications and family planning counseling were highly ranked components by all clinicians. In contrast, clinicians more often did not assess those care components that infrequently ranked highly among the priority listing, consisting mainly of social drivers of health such as screening and counseling for intimate partner violence, working conditions and food/housing insecurity. In both instances, we found little discordance between priorities and care practices. However, OB/GYNs and midwives differed in some care components that they prioritized highly.

conclusionsWhile there is growing understanding of how important professional society recommendations are for maternal-infant health, clinicians face barriers completing all recommendations, especially those components related to social drivers of health. However, what the clinicians do prioritize highly, they are likely to perform. Now that Medi-Cal (Medicaid) insurance is available in California for up to 12 months postpartum, there is a need to understand what care clinicians provide and what gaps remain.

Indexed as

ObstetricsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCaliforniaFemaleHealth PrioritiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMidwiferyPostnatal CarePregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesCaliforniaCare practicesClinical care guidelinesClinician care prioritiesMidwivesOB/GYNSPostpartum

Identifiers

PMID39054417
PMCPMC11274747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.