Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39054358›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2025

Successful treatment of hard flaccid syndrome with multimodal therapy: a case report study.

R Omer Yazar, Muhammed A M Hammad, David W Barham, Babak Azad, Faysal A Yafi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Omer Yazar *Bagcilar Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muhammed A M Hammad *Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. mahammad@hs.uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5396-1364
David W BarhamDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-4423
Babak AzadDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-4034
Faysal A YafiDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9408-482X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our article outlines a case study assessing the use of low-intensity shock wave therapy (LiSWT) for managing Hard Flaccid Syndrome (HFS). Given the absence of standardized treatments for HFS, LiSWT could serve as an additional tool in the treatment arsenal. The case involved a 36-year-old male presenting HFS, low libido, chronic pain, and erectile dysfunction. Treatment comprised phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5-I), physical therapy, and LiSWT. Following six sessions, the patient experienced regression of bothersome symptoms and improved erections. A 2-year follow-up revealed sustained symptom relief. LiSWT presents a non-invasive means of inducing mechanical stress and microtrauma in targeted tissues, fostering neovascularization and potentially enhancing blood supply. The integration of LiSWT with PDE5-I and physical therapy suggests a potential avenue for effective HFS management. Nevertheless, further systematic research is essential to validate the therapy's benefits and assess, if any, potential drawbacks.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyAdultChronic PainCombined Modality TherapyHumansMalePhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTreatment OutcomePhosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39054358
PMCPMC12185307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.