Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39053987›Full record

ArticleApplied nursing research : ANR2024

Does self-care improve coping or does coping improve self-care? A structural equation modeling study.

Barbara Riegel, Claudio Barbaranelli, Michael A Stawnychy, Austin Matus, Karen B Hirschman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara RiegelCenter for Home Care Policy & Research at VNS Health, New York, NY, United States of America; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Penn Medicine Princeton Health, Princeton, NJ, United States of America. Electronic address: briegel@nursing.upenn.edu.
Claudio BarbaranelliDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: Claudio.Barbaranelli@uniroma1.it.
Michael A StawnychyUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: mstawn@upenn.edu.
Austin MatusUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: Austin.Matus@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Karen B HirschmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: hirschk@nursing.upenn.edu.

Funding

Improving Self-Care of Informal Caregivers of Adults with Heart FailureR01NR018196 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RIEGEL, BARBARA J · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
A Mixed Methods Investigation of Attitudes and Self-Care in Individuals with Type-1 Diabetes Mellitus with Intact and Impaired Awareness of HypoglycemiaF31NR020137 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MATUS, AUSTIN M · 2022 to 2023
$53k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR020137NINR NIH HHS R01 NR018196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupport interventions often address both self-care and coping. Different approaches are used to promote self-care and coping so clarifying the intervention effect can guide clinicians and researchers to provide interventions that achieve benefit. PURPOSE: To compare two models to determine whether self-care improves coping or coping improves self-care.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data from 248 caregivers obtained at enrollment into a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a support intervention. Factor scores for scales measuring caregiver demand, self-care, coping, stress appraisal, and mental health were derived from exploratory factor analysis. Structural equation models were analyzed using the factor scores as estimates of each construct. To control possible spurious effects caregiver age, gender, relationship with the patient, and income adequacy were included.

resultsBoth models were compatible with the data, but the self-care model was stronger than the coping model. That model had a non-significant chi square and an excellent fit to the data, χ

conclusionsThe self-care model was strongest, illustrating that self-care decreases stress, promotes coping, and improves mental health. These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in improving mental health than interventions aimed at improving coping.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSelf CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedLatent class analysisPsychological adaptationPsychosocial support systemsSelf-care

Identifiers

PMID39053987
PMCPMC11282322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.