ArticleThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2024
Difficulty in Removing a Ureteral Stent post Childbirth due to Encrustation: A Case Report.
Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Double-J Ureteral Stenting in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Pivotal or Problematic?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe present a case involving a pregnant woman who needed transurethral lithotripsy for ureteral stent removal because of the stent encrustation. CLINICAL CASE: A 34-year-old woman was diagnosed with calculous pyelonephritis, and a double-loop ureteral stent was placed in her right ureter, after which the pyelonephritis resolved. One week after her delivery, we attempted to remove the ureteral stent; however, the encrustation of the proximal and distal coils made it impossible. We then crushed the encrustation by transurethral lithotripsy and removed the ureteral stent successfully. The encrustation component was calcium phosphate, and the urinary pH during pregnancy and after delivery was 7.5.
conclusionEven in pregnant patients, patients placed ureteral stents for obstructive pyelonephritis with high urine pH might need to be replaced in the short term due to concerns regarding phosphate encrustation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.