Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39053957›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Assessing the effectiveness of "BETTER Women", a community-based, primary care-linked peer health coaching programme for chronic disease prevention: protocol for a pragmatic, wait-list controlled, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Natasha Kithulegoda, Camille Williams, Aranee Senthilmurugan, Sabrina Aimola, John Atkinson, Ananya Tina Banerjee, Farnaz Bazeghi, Jacqueline L Bender, Susan Flynn, Lena Ghatage and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04746859 (BETTER Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04746859 nacompletednot on this map

BETTER Women: Community-Based, Primary Care-Linked Peer Health Coaching to Achieve Evidence-Based Preventive Care Goals - A Pragmatic, Wait-List Controlled Effectiveness-Implementation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled268ConditionsChronic Disease, CancerArmsPrevention Visit, Peer health coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Natasha KithulegodaInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6207-9699
Camille WilliamsInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aranee SenthilmuruganInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sabrina AimolaInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John AtkinsonOntario Public Health Association, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ananya Tina BanerjeeDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Farnaz BazeghiInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-2348-872X
Jacqueline L BenderDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-335X
Susan FlynnCanadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lena GhatageCanadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elaine GoulbournePeter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eva GrunfeldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ruth HeiseyPeter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anjana RaoInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kaylyn SutcliffeCanadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Aisha LoftersInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada aisha.lofters@wchospital.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7322-0894
Noah M IversInstitute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2500-2435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Building on Existing Tools to Improve Cancer and Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) programme trains allied health professionals working in primary care settings to develop personalised chronic disease 'prevention prescriptions' with patients. However, maintenance of health behaviour changes is difficult without ongoing support. Sustainable options to enhance the BETTER programme and ensure accessibility to underserved populations are needed. We designed the BETTER Women programme, which uses a digital app to match patients with a trained peer health coach (PHC) who provides ongoing support for health behaviour change after receipt of a BETTER prevention prescription in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a type 1 hybrid implementation-effectiveness patient-randomised trial. Interested women aged 40-68 years will be recruited from three large, sociodemographically distinct primary care clinics (urban, suburban and rural). Patients will be randomised 1:1 to intervention or wait-list control after receipt of their BETTER prevention prescription. We will aim to recruit 204 patients per group (408 total). Effectiveness will be assessed by the primary outcome of targeted behaviours achieved for each participant at 6 months, consisting of three cancer screening tests (cervical, breast and colorectal) and four behavioural determinants of cancer and chronic disease (diet, smoking, alcohol use and physical activity). Data will be collected through patient survey and clinical chart review, measured at 3, 6 and 12 months. Implementation outcomes will be assessed through patient surveys and interviews with patients, peer health coaches and healthcare providers. An embedded economic evaluation will examine cost per quality-adjusted life-year and per additional health behavioural targets achieved. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by Women's College Hospital Research Ethics Board (REB), the Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre REB and the University of Toronto REB. All participants will provide informed consent prior to enrolment. Participation is voluntary and withdrawal will have no impact on the usual care received from their primary care provider. The results of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared via conference presentations. Deidentified datasets will be shared on request, after publication of results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04746859.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseMentoringPeer GroupPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationResidence CharacteristicsWaiting ListsAdultAgedFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedChronic DiseaseClinical TrialHealth ServicesImplementation SciencePrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39053957
PMCPMC11284880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.