Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39053946›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Merkel cell carcinoma refractory to anti-PD(L)1: utility of adding ipilimumab for salvage therapy.

Tomoko Akaike, Austin J Jabbour, Peter H Goff, Song Y Park, Shailender Bhatia, Paul Nghiem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomoko AkaikeDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4525-6408
Austin J JabbourDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Peter H GoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-4997
Song Y ParkDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-1821
Shailender BhatiaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3816-2238
Paul NghiemDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA pnghiem@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-963X

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Understand & overcome resistance to PD-1P01CA225517 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Cecilia C Yeung · 2019 to 2026
$22.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA225517NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) incidence has risen to approximately 3,000 cases annually in the USA. Although anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) agents are now the first-line treatment for advanced MCC, approximately 50% of such patients do not persistently benefit. In PD-(L)1-refractory cases, ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4) is often added; however, the extent of the clinical benefit of this combination is controversial. We identified one prospective study, three retrospective studies, and three case reports regarding this combination in refractory MCC. The aggregate response rate from retrospective studies was 32% (13 of 41 patients) with 4 complete responses (CR) and 9 partial responses (PR). In the prospective study, the response rate was very similar at 31% (8 of 26 patients; 4 CR, 4 PR). Response durability was highly variable (range 2 to >43 months), with patients achieving CR having greater durability. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were ≥grade III in 29% (retrospective cohort, N=41) and 36% (prospective cohort, N=50). While these aggregate data indicate adding ipilimumab should be considered in this setting, many patients with refractory MCC are ineligible due to comorbidities/irAEs, and approximately 70% will not benefit from this regimen. There is thus a significant unmet need in PD-(L)1-refractory MCC and clinical trials in this setting should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellIpilimumabSalvage TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabImmune related adverse event - irAEImmunotherapySkin Cancer

Identifiers

PMID39053946
PMCPMC11284820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.