ArticleApplied clinical informatics2024
Increasing Generative Artificial Intelligence Competency among Students Enrolled in Doctoral Nursing Research Coursework.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence education and training for healthcare workers: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Measurement Properties of Instruments Assessing Digital Competence in Nursing: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Effects of a Metaverse-Based Generative AI Nursing Informatics Competency Education Program for Clinical Nurses.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Integrating generative AI into physiotherapy education: students' use, perceptions, and generative AI literacy following curricular adaptations: a repeated cross-sectional programme evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The experience of nursing students using generative artificial intelligence: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Research on artificial intelligence literacy among nursing professionals: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Curriculum Development and Implementation in Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Teaching Informatics Competencies within Nursing Education: A Scoping Review of Teaching Strategies.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Areas of research focus and trends in the research on the application of AIGC in healthcare.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) tools may soon be integrated into health care practice and research. Nurses in leadership roles, many of whom are doctorally prepared, will need to determine whether and how to integrate them in a safe and useful way.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a brief intervention to increase PhD nursing students' knowledge of appropriate applications for using generative AI tools in health care.
methodsWe created didactic lectures and laboratory-based activities to introduce generative AI to students enrolled in a nursing PhD data science and visualization course. Students were provided with a subscription to Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 4.0, a general-purpose generative AI tool, for use in and outside the class. During the didactic portion, we described generative AI and its current and potential future applications in health care, including examples of appropriate and inappropriate applications. In the laboratory sessions, students were given three tasks representing different use cases of generative AI in health care practice and research (clinical decision support, patient decision support, and scientific communication) and asked to engage with ChatGPT on each. Students (
resultsStudents were able to identify the strengths and limitations of ChatGPT in completing all three tasks and developed opinions on whether they would feel comfortable using ChatGPT for similar tasks in the future. All of them reported increasing their self-rated competency in generative AI by one to two points on a five-point rating scale.
conclusionThis brief educational intervention supported doctoral nursing students in understanding the appropriate uses of ChatGPT, which may support their ability to appraise and use these tools in their future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.