Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39053567›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2024

Estimating individualized treatment rules by optimizing the adjusted probability of a longer survival.

Qijia He, Shixiao Zhang, Michael L LeBlanc, Ying-Qi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qijia HeDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shixiao ZhangAlexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Michael L LeBlancPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ying-Qi ZhaoPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-2257

Funding

SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individualized treatment rules inform tailored treatment decisions based on the patient's information, where the goal is to optimize clinical benefit for the population. When the clinical outcome of interest is survival time, most of current approaches typically aim to maximize the expected time of survival. We propose a new criterion for constructing Individualized treatment rules that optimize the clinical benefit with survival outcomes, termed as the adjusted probability of a longer survival. This objective captures the likelihood of living longer with being on treatment, compared to the alternative, which provides an alternative and often straightforward interpretation to communicate with clinicians and patients. We view it as an alternative to the survival analysis standard of the hazard ratio and the increasingly used restricted mean survival time. We develop a new method to construct the optimal Individualized treatment rule by maximizing a nonparametric estimator of the adjusted probability of a longer survival for a decision rule. Simulation studies demonstrate the reliability of the proposed method across a range of different scenarios. We further perform data analysis using data collected from a randomized Phase III clinical trial (SWOG S0819).

Indexed as

Precision MedicineProbabilityComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival Analysisadjusted probability of a longer survivalcensored dataindividualized treatment ruleinverse probability of censoring weightingkernel smootherPersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID39053567
PMCPMC11671293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.