ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2024
Glycoengineering in antigen-specific immunotherapies.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing inflammation and regeneration: immune cell dynamics in nerve repair: a comprehensive review.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy as a Potential Treatment Option for Lung Cancer: A Perspective Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Immunological and pathological roles of Siglecs: a molecular review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Constructing a Prognostic Model for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Glycosyltransferase Gene and Verification of Key Gene Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Loop-Closing Dynamics of β-1,4 Galactosyltransferase 1.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in immunotherapy have revolutionized modern medical care paradigms. However, many patients respond poorly to the current FDA-approved treatment regimens that primarily target protein-based antigens or checkpoints. Current progress in developing therapeutic strategies that target disease-associated glycans has pinpointed a new class of glycoimmune checkpoints that function orthogonally to the established protein-immune checkpoints. Glycoengineering using chemical, enzymatic, and genetic methods is also increasingly recognized for its massive potential to improve biopharmaceuticals, such as tailoring therapies with antigen-targeting agents. Here, we review the recent development and applications of glycoengineering of antibodies and cells to suit therapeutic applications. We highlight living-cell glycoengineering strategies on cancer and immune cells for better therapeutic efficacy against specific antigens by leveraging the pre-existing immune machinery or instructing de novo creation of targeting agents. We also discuss glycoengineering strategies for studying basic immuno-oncology. Collectively, glycoengineering has a significant contribution to the design of antigen-specific immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.