Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39052987›Full record

ArticleMedicine, science, and the law2025

Developing an initial programme theory for a model of social care in prisons and on release (empowered together): A realist synthesis approach.

Deborah Buck, Lee D Mulligan, Charlotte Lennox, Jana Bowden, Matilda Minchin, Lowenna Kemp, Lucy Devine, Joshua Southworth, Falaq Ghafur, Catherine Robinson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, science, and the law, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Deborah BuckSocial Care and Society, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-6400
Lee D MulliganDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Charlotte LennoxDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jana BowdenDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matilda MinchinDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lowenna KempPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Lucy DevinePennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.
Joshua SouthworthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Falaq GhafurUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Catherine RobinsonSocial Care and Society, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew ShepherdGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-746X
Jennifer J ShawDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Katrina ForsythSocial Care and Society, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9980-9464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many people are living in prison with a range of social care needs, for example, requiring support with washing, eating, getting around safely, and/or maintaining relationships. However, social care for this vulnerable group is generally inadequate. There is uncertainty and confusion about who is legally responsible for this and how it can best be provided, and a lack of integration with healthcare. We used realist-informed approaches to develop an initial programme theory (IPT) for identifying/assessing social care needs of, and providing care to, male adults in prison and on release. IPT development was an iterative process involving (a) an initial scoping of the international prison literature; (b) scoping prison and community social care policy documents and guidelines; (c) full systematic search of the international prison social care literature; (d) insights from the community social care literature; (e) stakeholder workshops. Information from 189 documents/sources and stakeholder feedback informed the IPT, which recommended that models of prison social care should be: trauma-informed; well integrated with health, criminal justice, third-sector services and families; and person-centred involving service-users in all aspects including co-production of care plans, goals, and staff training/awareness programmes. Our IPT provides an initial gold standard model for social care provision for people in prison and on release. The model, named Empowered Together, will be evaluated in a future trial and will be of interest to those working in the criminal justice system, care providers and commissioners, local authorities, housing authorities, voluntary groups, and service-users and their families.

Indexed as

PrisonersPrisonsSocial WorkHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalProgram DevelopmentAdult offenderhuman rightsolder adultprisonsocial caresocial justice

Identifiers

PMID39052987
PMCPMC12149453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.