ArticleJournal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners2025
Article in Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionFirst-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer typically involves a fluoropyrimidine, like 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), along with a folate agent, levoleucovorin. However, calcium-based levoleucovorin with 5-FU necessitates sequential infusion due to incompatibility, leading to calcium carbonate precipitation and potential IV catheter occlusion. In contrast, sodium-based levoleucovorin (disodium levoleucovorin-Khapzory) exhibits higher solubility in the low pH environment of 5-FU, enabling combination within a single IV bag for simultaneous infusion. This study aims to assess the safety of combining different concentrations of disodium levoleucovorin with 5-FU to create a single IV admixture bag or single pump Y-site, without risk of precipitate formation and catheter occlusion.MethodsCompatibility of admixture 5-FU and disodium levoleucovorin in a 0.9% sodium chloride IV bag was evaluated, focussing on clarity (suspension, precipitation, and haziness). Particulate matter analysis was conducted at 25°C/60% relative humidity, for 29 samples at five timepoints. Defined pass criteria included a minimum of 6000 particles ≥10 µm per container and 600 particles ≥25 µm.ResultsAll prepared concentrations remained clear for up to 72 h with no observed suspension, precipitation or haziness at any concentration or time point.ConclusionsCombining 5-FU and disodium levoleucovorin in admixture IV bags eliminates the risk of catheter occlusion associated with calcium-based levoleucovorin formulations. This approach offers a more favorable operational and safety profile, enhancing convenience for patients and cost-efficiency for institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.