Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39052648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Barriers and enablers to the implementation of immediate postpartum and post-abortion family planning service integration in primary health care units of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A baseline study for implementation research.

Mengistu Meskele, Fekadu Elias Sadamo, Banchialem Nega Angore, Samson Kastro Dake, Wondwosen Mekonnen, Addisalem Titiyos Kebede, Yohannes Mihretie Adinew, Bilal Shikur, Meselech Assegid, Naod Firdu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mengistu MeskeleDepartment of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-6157-4591
Fekadu Elias SadamoDepartment of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Banchialem Nega AngoreSchool of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Samson Kastro DakeDepartment of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-7687-4674
Wondwosen MekonnenEngenderhealth Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addisalem Titiyos KebedeEngenderhealth Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yohannes Mihretie AdinewEngenderhealth Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bilal ShikurSchool of Public Health, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Meselech AssegidSchool of Public Health, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Naod FirduSchool of Public Health, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Senait SeidSchool of Public Health, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abiy SeifuSchool of Public Health, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence indicates that postpartum and post-abortion women accept family planning at a higher rate when offered timely at appropriate sites. Therefore, this study explored barriers and enablers of postpartum and post-abortion family planning utilization in primary health care units of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, from June 20 to July 25, 2022.

methodsWe used a case study strategy of qualitative research using both the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Gender, Youth, and Social Inclusion (GYSI) frameworks was conducted from June to July 2022. We conducted 41 in-depth and key informant interviews and six focus group discussions. We also used Open Code software version 4.02 for coding and further analysis and applied a framework analysis.

resultsThe analysis of this study identified barriers and enablers of postpartum and post-abortion family planning service uptake in five CFIR domains and four GYSI components. The barriers included misconceptions and sole decision-making by husbands, cultural and religious barriers, and healthcare providers paying less attention to adolescents and husbands, which prevented them from using immediate postpartum and postabortion family planning services. The health facilities were not adequately staffed; there was a shortage and delay of supplies and infrastructure, trained staff turnover, and poor accountability among service providers. The existence of community structure, equal access and legal rights to the service, and having waivered services were enablers for postpartum and post-abortion family planning service uptake. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The current study identified various barriers and enablers to the uptake of postpartum and post-abortion family planning. Therefore, there is a need for high-impact interventions such as targeting male partners and girls, ensuring infrastructure, supplies, and equipment, building staff capacity, and making decisions jointly.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedFamily Planning ServicesPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultEthiopiaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePostpartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39052648
PMCPMC11271869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.