ArticlePloS one2024
A deep learning framework for the early detection of multi-retinal diseases.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- RetinoMamba-AnatomyQuery: Anatomy-Guided Query Learning for Efficient Vision Impairment Screening from Retinal Fundus Images.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Swin-DRNet: A robust transformer framework for diabetic retinopathy screening under heterogeneous imaging conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrated deep learning model for multi-label retinal disease diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early retinal disease detection from fundus images using deep neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence for automated interpretation of corneal topography and early keratoconus detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for precision therapeutics in age-related macular degeneration: current advances, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in fundus photography for type 2 diabetes: a scoping review of systemic biomarkers and multi-organ risk prediction.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Intelligent retinal disease detection using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Lightweight CNN for Multiclass Retinal Disease Screening with Explainable AI.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence derived grading of mustard gas induced corneal injury and opacity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comparative study of machine learning models for automated detection and classification of retinal diseases in Ghana.PloS one · 2025Article
- OculusNet: Detection of retinal diseases using a tailored web-deployed neural network and saliency maps for explainable AI.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal images play a pivotal contribution to the diagnosis of various ocular conditions by ophthalmologists. Extensive research was conducted to enable early detection and timely treatment using deep learning algorithms for retinal fundus images. Quick diagnosis and treatment planning can be facilitated by deep learning models' ability to process images rapidly and deliver outcomes instantly. Our research aims to provide a non-invasive method for early detection and timely eye disease treatment using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). We used a dataset Retinal Fundus Multi-disease Image Dataset (RFMiD), which contains various categories of fundus images representing different eye diseases, including Media Haze (MH), Optic Disc Cupping (ODC), Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), and healthy images (WNL). Several pre-processing techniques were applied to improve the model's performance, such as data augmentation, cropping, resizing, dataset splitting, converting images to arrays, and one-hot encoding. CNNs have extracted extract pertinent features from the input color fundus images. These extracted features are employed to make predictive diagnostic decisions. In this article three CNN models were used to perform experiments. The model's performance is assessed utilizing statistical metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision. Based on the results, the developed framework demonstrates promising performance with accuracy rates of up to 89.81% for validation and 88.72% for testing using 12-layer CNN after Data Augmentation. The accuracy rate obtained from 20-layer CNN is 90.34% for validation and 89.59% for testing with Augmented data. The accuracy obtained from 20-layer CNN is greater but this model shows overfitting. These accuracy rates suggested that the deep learning model has learned to distinguish between different eye disease categories and healthy images effectively. This study's contribution lies in providing a reliable and efficient diagnostic system for the simultaneous detection of multiple eye diseases through the analysis of color fundus images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.