ArticlePloS one2024
Assessing the accuracy of spectral indices obtained from Sentinel images using field research to estimate land degradation.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wind erosion resulting from soil degradation is a significant problem in Iran's Baluchistan region. This study evaluated the accuracy of remote sensing models in assessing degradation severity through field studies. Sentinel-2 Multispectral Imager's (MSI) Level-1C satellite data was used to map Rutak's degradation severity in Saravan. The relationship between surface albedo and spectral indices (NDVI, SAVI, MSAVI, BSI, TGSI) was assessed. Linear regression establishes correlations between the albedo and each index, producing a degradation severity map categorized into five classes based on albedo and spectral indices. Accuracy was tested with 100 ground control points and field observations. The Mann-Whitney U-Test compares remote sensing models with field data. Results showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between NDVI, SAVI, and MSAVI models with field data, while BSI and TGSI models exhibited significant differences (P ≤ 0.001). The best model, BSI-NDVI, achieves a regression coefficient of 0.86. This study demonstrates the advantage of remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring degraded areas, providing valuable insights into land degradation assessment in Baluchistan. By accurately identifying severity levels, informed interventions can be implemented to mitigate wind erosion and combat soil degradation in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.