ReviewJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2024
Are osteoblasts multiple cell types? A new diversity in skeletal stem cells and their derivatives.
Review in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vertebral metastatic disease: A paradigm shift.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Bone formation niche dysfunction in osteoporosis: insights from single-cell and spatial transcriptomic studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Control of alveolar bone development, homeostasis, and socket healing by salt-inducible kinases.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025Article
- Harnessing the diversity and potential of endogenous skeletal stem cells for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Only in the past decade have skeletal stem cells (SSCs), a cell type displaying formal evidence of stemness and serving as the ultimate origin of mature skeletal cell types such as osteoblasts, been defined. Here, we discuss a pair of recent reports that identify that SSCs do not represent a single cell type, but rather a family of related cells that each have characteristic anatomic locations and distinct functions tailored to the physiology of those sites. The distinct functional properties of these SSCs in turn provide a basis for the diseases of their respective locations. This concept emerges from one report identifying a distinct vertebral skeletal stem cell driving the high rate of breast cancer metastasis to the spine over other skeletal sites and a report identifying 2 SSCs in the calvaria that interact to mediate both physiologic calvarial mineralization and pathologic calvarial suture fusion in craniosynostosis. Despite displaying functional differences, these SSCs are each united by shared features including a shared series of surface markers and parallel differentiation hierarchies. We propose that this diversity at the level of SSCs in turn translates into a similar diversity at the level of mature skeletal cell types, including osteoblasts, with osteoblasts derived from different SSCs each displaying different functional and transcriptional characteristics reflecting their cell of origin. In this model, osteoblasts would represent not a single cell type, but rather a family of related cells each with distinct functions, paralleling the functional diversity in SSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.