ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024
Identification of eupneic breathing using machine learning.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A respiratory signature of disease progression in the Pompe rat.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Impact of upper cervical spinal cord hemisection on diaphragm neuromotor control.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- An update on spinal cord injury and diaphragm neuromotor control.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2025Review
- A Simple, Low-Cost Implant for Reliable Diaphragm EMG Recordings in Awake, Behaving Rats.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Hypercapnia impacts neural drive and timing of diaphragm neuromotor control.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diaphragm muscle (DIAm) is the primary inspiratory muscle in mammals. In awake animals, considerable heterogeneity in the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the DIAm reflects varied ventilatory and nonventilatory behaviors. Experiments in awake animals are an essential component to understanding the neuromotor control of breathing, which has especially begun to be appreciated within the last decade. However, insofar as the intent is to study the control of breathing, it is paramount to identify DIAm EMG activity that in fact reflects breathing. Current strategies for doing so in a reproducible, reliable, and efficient fashion are lacking. In the present article, we evaluated DIAm EMG from awake animals using hierarchical clustering across four-dimensional feature space to classify eupneic breathing. Our model, which can be implemented with automated threshold of the clustering dendrogram, successfully identified eupneic breathing with high F1 score (0.92), specificity (0.70), and accuracy (0.88), suggesting that it is a robust and reliable tool for investigating the neural control of breathing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.