ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2024
From mundane to surprising nonadditivity: drivers and impact on ML models.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Activity-cliff awareness enables robust graph learning for molecular property prediction.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonadditivity (NA) in Structure-Activity and Structure-Property Relationship (SAR) data is a rare but very information rich phenomenon. It can indicate conformational flexibility, structural rearrangements, and errors in assay results and structural assignment. While purely ligand-based conformational causes of NA are rather well understood and mundane, other factors are less so and cause surprising NA that has a huge influence on SAR analysis and ML model performance. We here report a systematic analysis across a wide range of properties (20 on-target biological activities and 4 physicochemical ADME-related properties) to understand the frequency of various different phenomena that may lead to NA. A set of novel descriptors were developed to characterize double transformation cycles and identify trends in NA. Double transformation cycles were classified into "surprising" and "mundane" categories, with the majority being classed as mundane. We also examined commonalities among surprising cycles, finding LogP differences to have the most significant impact on NA. A distinct behavior of NA for on-target sets compared to ADME sets was observed. Finally, we show that machine learning models struggle with highly nonadditive data, indicating that a better understanding of NA is an important future research direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39052103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.