SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2024
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical correlates and predictors of thrombocytopenia in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Article
- Application Value of Blood Routine-Derived Indices for the Evaluation of Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio combined with SLEDAI predicts lupus low disease activity state at 1 year: a cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Pathogenesis of renal involvement in primary Sjögren's disease: convergence of multifactorial mechanisms on immune dysregulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Clinical significance of erythrocyte sedimentation rate-based stratification in a large retrospective SLE cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Assessment of New Inflammatory Indexes in Systemic Sclerosis with Interstitial Lung Disease.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics of IgG4-related lung disease: a single-center based experience.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Genotype-Phenotype Relationship in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: Quality of Life and Cardiovascular Risk Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Markers and Response to Biological Therapy in Patients with Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and CD40 as diagnostic biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus and its disease activity.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- NLR (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio), PLR (platelet to lymphocyte ratio), and SII (systemic immune-inflammation index) reflect disease activity and renal remission in patients with lupus nephritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The wide range of clinical and serological manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the lack of accepted diagnostic criteria warrant the identification of novel, more accurate biomarkers. Hematological indices derived from full blood cell counts, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have shown promise in SLE; however, a critical appraisal of their diagnostic accuracy is lacking. We sought to address this issue by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the NLR and PLR in SLE. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to 15 March 2024 for studies reporting the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR and PLR, obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the presence of SLE, disease severity, organ involvement (lupus nephritis, pericarditis, and pleural disease), and complications (infections). The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024531446). The NLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of SLE (eight studies; area under the curve, AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.85) and lupus nephritis (nine studies; AUC = 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.84), but not for severe disease (nine studies; AUC = 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) or infections (six studies; AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77). The PLR exhibited good accuracy for the diagnosis of severe disease (six studies; AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.87). There were an insufficient number of studies to assess the accuracy of the PLR for the diagnosis of SLE, lupus nephritis, or infections. No study investigated the NLR and PLR in SLE patients with pericarditis or pleural disease. Therefore, the NLR and the PLR have a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for the presence of SLE and lupus nephritis (NLR) and severe disease (PLR). Further studies are warranted to determine whether the NLR and PLR, in combination with clinical evaluation and other serological biomarkers, can enhance the diagnosis and management of SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.