Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39052080›Full record

ReviewExtremophiles : life under extreme conditions2024

RNase R vs. PNPase: selecting the best-suited exoribonuclease for environmental adaptation.

Theetha L Pavankumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Theetha L PavankumarDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. pavan@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1845-9592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3' → 5' exoribonucleases play a critical role in many aspects of RNA metabolism. RNase R, PNPase, and RNase II are the major contributors to RNA processing, maturation, and quality control in bacteria. Bacteria don't seem to have dedicated RNA degradation machineries to process different classes of RNAs. Under different environmental and physiological conditions, their roles can be redundant and sometimes overlapping. Here, I discuss why PNPase and RNase R may have switched their physiological roles in some bacterial species to adapt to environmental conditions, despite being biochemically distinct exoribonucleases.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalExoribonucleasesBacterial ProteinsBacterial ProteinsExoribonucleasesribonuclease REnvironmental adaptationExoribonucleaseLow temperaturePNPaseRNA degradationRNA helicaseRNase R

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.