Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39052038›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Machine perfusion in transplantation surgery].

Felicia Kneifel, Florian Vondran, Thomas Vogel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felicia KneifelKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
Florian VondranKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Kinder- und Transplantationschirurgie, RWTH Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Thomas VogelKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Kinder- und Transplantationschirurgie, RWTH Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. tvogel@ukaachen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of machine perfusion in solid organ transplantation has developed tremendously worldwide in recent years. Although the number of randomized controlled trials in the field of organ preservation is still limited, machine perfusion has been shown to be superior to static cold storage of donor organs. Various devices for clinical use with hypothermia or normothermia are already available for most organs. Whether and which perfusion strategy is superior to the others is the subject of current clinical research. This also applies to the further evaluation of possible synergistic effects in the sequential use of the various protocols. The common goal of all dynamic perfusion technologies is to optimize organ preservation between removal and transplantation. By testing the quality of marginal donor organs prior to transplantation, it should also be possible to use these organs without exposing the patient to increased risk. This can lead to a significant expansion of the donor pool. This is particularly important in Germany, where there is an ongoing shortage of organs and restrictive legislation regarding the expansion of the donor pool. Furthermore, the perfusion technology offers the possibility to serve as a platform for other ex situ and in situ therapies on isolated organs. In addition to the conditioning of pre-damaged organs for transplantation, this could lead to further applications in the context of targeted organ therapies and also to improved transplant logistics in the future.

Indexed as

Organ PreservationPerfusionHumansOrgan TransplantationHypothermic machine perfusionNormothermic machine perfusionOrgan conservationOrgan transplantationViability testing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.