Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39052010›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2024

No evidence of pathogenicity of Dientamoeba fragilis following detection in stools: A case-control study.

Germain Tchamwa Bamini, Eléna Charpentier, Emilie Guemas, Pamela Chauvin, Judith Fillaux, Alexis Valentin, Sophie Cassaing, Sandie Ménard, Antoine Berry, Xavier Iriart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Germain Tchamwa BaminiParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Eléna CharpentierParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Emilie GuemasParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France - Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse University, CNRS UMR5051, INSERM UMR1291, Paul Sabatier University, 31024 Toulouse, France.
Pamela ChauvinParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Judith FillauxParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France - RESTORE Institute, UMR 1301-Inserm 5070-CNRS EFS Paul Sabatier University, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Alexis ValentinParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France - UMR 152 PHARMA-DEV, IRD, UPS, Toulouse University, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Sophie CassaingParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France - RESTORE Institute, UMR 1301-Inserm 5070-CNRS EFS Paul Sabatier University, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Sandie MénardToulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse University, CNRS UMR5051, INSERM UMR1291, Paul Sabatier University, 31024 Toulouse, France.
Antoine BerryParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France - Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse University, CNRS UMR5051, INSERM UMR1291, Paul Sabatier University, 31024 Toulouse, France.
Xavier IriartParasitology-Mycology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France - Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse University, CNRS UMR5051, INSERM UMR1291, Paul Sabatier University, 31024 Toulouse, France.

Funding

This research received no external funding.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dientamoeba fragilis is a ubiquitous intestinal parasite with detection in the stools that has become increasingly frequent following the advent of PCR as a routine screening tool. However, the pathogenicity of this parasite is still much debated. In order to assess the potentially pathogenic nature of this protozoan, a retrospective case-control study was carried out between January and December 2020 on patients from Toulouse University Hospital, with the aim of evaluating the potential clinical effects and changes in laboratory parameters linked to the presence and load of D. fragilis in stools. After matching age, sex and mode of care (consultation or hospitalisation), no significant difference was observed in the frequency of clinical signs between the 36 patients who tested positive for Dientamoeba fragilis PCR in their stools and the 72 control patients who were PCR negative for this protozoan. The presence of D. fragilis in the faeces was not associated with changes in laboratory parameters. Furthermore, a high digestive load of D. fragilis had no identifiable impact on clinical and laboratory parameters. Only the concomitant presence of Blastocystis sp. in stools was significantly more frequent in the D. fragilis group (uni- and multivariate analysis). Finally, this study showed no significant difference in clinical or laboratory signs between patients carrying Dientamoeba fragilis and the control group, regardless of the intestinal parasite load, suggesting that D. fragilis could be considered a commensal of the digestive tract.

Indexed as

DientamoebaDientamoebiasisFecesPolymerase Chain ReactionAdultAgedBlastocystisCase-Control StudiesDNA, ProtozoanFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultDNA, ProtozoanBlastocystis sp.Dientamoeba fragilisPathogenicityStools

Identifiers

PMID39052010
PMCPMC11271704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.