Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051565›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Global Hemostatic Methods to Tailor Treatment With Bypassing Agents in Hemophilia A With Inhibitors- A Single-Center, Pilot Study.

Roza Chaireti, Nida Soutari, Margareta Holmström, Pia Petrini, Maria Magnusson, Susanna Ranta, Iva Pruner, Jovan P Antovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Innovative Diagnostic Solutions in Hemostasis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Laboratory Assessment of Emicizumab Levels in Hemophilia A: Influence of Assay Selection on Reported Results.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roza ChairetiDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-1903
Nida SoutariDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Margareta HolmströmCoagulation Unit, Department of Haematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pia PetriniPediatric Coagulation Unit, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria MagnussonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanna RantaPediatric Coagulation Unit, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Iva PrunerDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jovan P AntovicDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors treated with bypassing agents there are no reliable methods to assess treatment effect. We investigated the utility of global hemostatic methods in assessing treatment with bypassing agents (rFVIIa or activated prothrombin complex [aPCC]). All patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors followed at the Coagulation Unit or the Pediatric Coagulation Unit at Karolinska University Hospital aged 6 years and above were eligible for this noninterventional study. Baseline plasma samples were spiked with bypassing agents in increasing concentrations (aPCC 50 U/kg, 100 U/kg, 150 U/kg, and rFVIIa 90 μg/kg and 270 μg/kg) in vitro. For patients treated with factor concentrates or bypassing agents follow-up samples were collected (in vivo tests). The samples were analyzed using overall hemostatic potential (OHP), and calibrated automated thrombogram, Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT). Nine patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors were included. Spiking with rFVIIa normalized the coagulation potential in 6/8 samples, in 3 only with high dose. Only one sample did not improve adequately after spiking with aPCC. The improvement in hemostasis was reliably shown by both CAT and OHP. The baseline potential was, however, more often measurable by OHP compared to CAT. Factor concentrate had been administered to 5 patients normalizing the hemostatic potential in vivo in 2 (without spiking). The hemostatic improvement induced by spiking with rFVIIa or aPCC is shown by OHP and CAT, but the results have to be evaluated in larger cohorts.

Indexed as

Factor VIIaHemophilia AAdolescentAdultBlood Coagulation FactorsChildFemaleHemostasisHemostaticsHumansMalePilot ProjectsRecombinant ProteinsBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor VIIaHemostaticsrecombinant FVIIaRecombinant Proteinsactivated prothrombin complex concentratehemophilia Ainhibitorrecombinant factor VIIathrombin generation

Identifiers

PMID39051565
PMCPMC11273572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.