Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051450›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2025

Key professional stakeholders roles in promoting older people's autonomy in residential care.

Tanja Moilanen, Riitta Suhonen, Mari Kangasniemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanja MoilanenSavonia University of Applied Sciences.ORCID 0000-0003-1657-1791
Riitta SuhonenUniversity of Turku.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-5550
Mari KangasniemiUniversity of Turku.ORCID 0000-0003-0690-1865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people's autonomy is an ethical and legal principle in everyday residential care, but there is a lack of clarity about the roles and responsibilities of the key professional stakeholder groups involved. RESEARCH

objectivesThis study aimed to identify and define the roles and responsibilities of the key professional stakeholder groups involved in promoting older people's autonomy in residential care settings. RESEARCH

designWe used a Delphi method with two iterative rounds of online group discussions and collected data from experts in older people's care in Finland in summer 2020. The data were analyzed using deductive-inductive content analysis methods. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: According to Finnish legislation, this type of research did not need approval from a research ethics committee. Informed consent from the participants was obtained and they were informed about the voluntary nature and confidentiality of the study and their right to withdraw at any time.

resultsKey professional stakeholders had different roles and responsibilities, but their shared, integrated goal was to achieve older people's autonomy in residential care settings. Their combined roles and responsibilities covered all aspects of promoting older people's autonomy, from care and service planning and daily decision-making to service structures that included ethical competencies and monitoring. Multipronged, variable, coordinated strategies were required to identify, assess, and promote autonomy at different levels of care.

conclusionKey professional stakeholders need to work together to provide an unbroken chain of care that provides older people with autonomy in residential care settings. In future, more knowledge is needed about how to create structures to achieve the shared goal of older people's autonomy in these settings.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomyProfessional RoleStakeholder ParticipationAgedDelphi TechniqueFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchResidential FacilitiesChain of careDelphi methodethicsolder peoplepromoting autonomyresidential care

Identifiers

PMID39051450
PMCPMC11800729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.