Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051401›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024

Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the UK.

Karen Bean, Simon A Jones, Anupam Chakrapani, Suresh Vijay, Teresa Wu, Heather Church, Charlotte Chanson, Andrew Olaye, Beckley Miller, Ivar Jensen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen BeanOrchard Therapeutics, London W6 8PW, UK.
Simon A JonesDivision of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Anupam ChakrapaniGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK.
Suresh VijayBirmingham Women's and Children NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK.
Teresa WuDivision of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6471-6743
Heather ChurchDivision of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Charlotte ChansonOrchard Therapeutics, London W6 8PW, UK.
Andrew OlayeOrchard Therapeutics, London W6 8PW, UK.
Beckley MillerPrecision AQ, Boston, MA 02108, USA.
Ivar JensenPrecision AQ, Boston, MA 02108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0524-2709
Francis PangOrchard Therapeutics, London W6 8PW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a fatal inherited lysosomal storage disease that can be detected through newborn bloodspot screening. The feasibility of the screening assay and the clinical rationale for screening for MLD have been previously demonstrated, so the aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of screening for MLD to the routine newborn screening program in the UK is a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources. A health economic analysis from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services was developed based on a decision-tree framework for each MLD subtype using long-term outcomes derived from a previously presented partitioned survival and Markov economic model. Modelling inputs for parameters related to epidemiology, test characteristics, screening and treatment costs were based on data from three major UK specialist MLD hospitals, structured expert opinion and published literature. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 1.5% to account for time preference. Uncertainty associated with the parameter inputs was explored using sensitivity analyses. This health economic analysis demonstrates that newborn screening for MLD is a cost-effective use of NHS resources using a willingness-to-pay threshold appropriate to the severity of the disease; and supports the inclusion of MLD into the routine newborn screening programme in the UK.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenesscost utility analysisdecision-tree modelmetachromatic leukodystrophyMLDnewborn screeningNHS

Identifiers

PMID39051401
PMCPMC11270184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.