ReviewClinics and practice2024
Revisiting Pulmonary Sclerosing Pneumocytoma.
Review in Clinics and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics of pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma (PSP).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma (PSP) is a quite rare tumor outside Eastern countries. This rarity, together with a wide histological appearance, makes its correct identification a diagnostic challenge for pathologists under the microscope. Historically, PSP was considered a vascular-derived neoplasm (sclerosing hemangioma), but its immunohistochemical profile clearly supports its epithelial origin. No specific molecular fingerprint has been detected so far. This short narrative revisits the clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular aspects of this tumor, paying special attention to some controversial points still not well clarified, i.e., clinical aggressiveness and metastatic spread, multifocality, the supposed development of sarcomatoid change in a subset of cases, and tumor associations with lung adenocarcinoma and/or well-differentiated neuroendocrine hyperplasia/tumors. The specific diagnostic difficulties on fine-needle aspiration cytology/biopsy and perioperative frozen sections are also highlighted. Finally, a teaching case of tumor concurrence of lung adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine lesions, and PSP, paradigmatic of tumor association in this context, is also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.