Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051300›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2024

A Non-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma That Changed to a Prolactinoma.

Cristina Santiago-Vazquez, Nuria Palacios-Paino, Fernando Cordido

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina Santiago-VazquezServicio Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain.
Nuria Palacios-PainoServicio Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain.
Fernando CordidoServicio Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3528-8174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are the third most common brain tumors in adults right after meningiomas and gliomas. Taking into account their hormonal activity in vivo, they can be divided in functioning PAs, which secrete hormones, and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs), which are not associated with increased hormone secretion. We present the case of a man diagnosed with pituitary apoplexy. A transsphenoidal surgery was performed with subtotal removal of the mass. Pituitary hormones were measured before and after the procedure on several occasions, showing always normal PRL values, so he was diagnosed with a clinically NFPA. Two years later, the patient noticed a visual deficit. A new magnetic resonance imaging study was performed, showing adenomatous recurrence, and the patient underwent a new surgery. After this, hormonal evaluation revealed high levels of PRL on several occasions. After treatment with cabergoline was started, PRL levels normalized, the visual deficit improved, and there was a slight adenoma reduction. This case report represents an exception to the paradigm that in the presence of a macroadenoma and normal PRL levels (avoiding the "hook effect"), a prolactinoma can be discarded. Moreover, it stresses the importance of comprehensive, regular, and lifelong surveillance of patients with NFPAs and the close monitoring of serum PRL.

Indexed as

macroprolactinomasnon-secreting pituitary adenomapituitary adenomasprolactinomas

Identifiers

PMID39051300
PMCPMC11270279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.