Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051292›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2024

Individualized Cognitive Functional Therapy Compared with Conservative Treatment for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain-Study Protocol for a Single Blind Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

George Ploutarchou, Vasileios Korakakis, Evi Lazoura, Christos Savva, Kyriakos Pavlou, Iacovos Christofi, Katerina Sotiriou, Chara Savvidou, Andreas Panteli, Christos Karagiannis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

George PloutarchouDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-1759-1148
Vasileios KorakakisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-8033-3934
Evi LazouraDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Christos SavvaDepartment of Life and Health Science, Federick University, Limassol 3080, Cyprus.
Kyriakos PavlouDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Iacovos ChristofiDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Katerina SotiriouDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Chara SavvidouDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Andreas PanteliDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.
Christos KaragiannisDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-5923-7721
Ioannis MamaisDepartment of Health Science, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-4835-8031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic neck pain (CNP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions, is considered the second leading cause of pain, and is among the leading causes of disability. Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a novel behavioral therapy for individualizing the management of spinal pain targeting the multidimensional aspect of musculoskeletal pain. This study outlines the protocol for an assessor-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare an individualized Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) intervention with usual care in terms of pain and disability. Aiming for a pragmatic intervention, the CFT group will receive 16 sessions based on patient's condition characteristics, and clinical presentation and progression. The control group will receive 16 sessions of standardized usual care (electrotherapy, massage, posture exercise, and educations). Both groups will have the same intervention duration. Patients will be randomly allocated into groups and will be assessed at baseline, at the 8th session, at the 16th session, and 3 months after randomization. Primary outcomes will be pain, disability, cervical range of motion, and neck muscle isometric strength. To our knowledge, this study will be the first RCT to compare the clinical effectiveness of CFT compared to UC for adults with CNP. The study results will provide information about the use of CFT in clinical practice.

Indexed as

chronic painclinical practicecognitive functional therapyneck painphysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39051292
PMCPMC11270437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.