ArticleProteomes2024
Investigating and Annotating the Human Peptidome Profile from Urine under Normal Physiological Conditions.
Article in Proteomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urine as a source of biomarkers and biological knowledge in chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Urinary Micropeptides: Integrative In Silico Profiling and LC-MS/MS Analysis for Prostate Cancer Biomarker Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Urinary Peptidome to Unravel Collagen Degradation in Health and Kidney Disease.Proteomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Examining the composition of the typical urinary peptidome and identifying the enzymes responsible for its formation holds significant importance, as it mirrors the normal physiological state of the human body. Any deviation from this normal profile could serve as an indicator of pathological processes occurring in vivo. Consequently, this study focuses on characterizing the normal urinary peptidome and investigating the various catalytic enzymes that are involved in generating these native peptides in urine. Our findings reveal that 1503 endogenous peptides, corresponding to 436 precursor proteins, were consistently identified robustly in at least 10 samples out of a total of 19 samples. Notably, the liver and kidneys exhibited the highest number of tissue-enriched or enhanced genes in the analyzed urinary peptidome. Furthermore, among the catalytic types, CTSD (cathepsin D) and MMP2 (matrix metalloproteinase-2) emerged as the most prominent peptidases in the aspartic and metallopeptidases categories, respectively. A comparison of our dataset with two of the most comprehensive urine peptidome datasets to date indicates a consistent relative abundance of core endogenous peptides for different proteins across all three datasets. These findings can serve as a foundational reference for the discovery of biomarkers in various human diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.