Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051034›Full record

ArticleAddiction & health2024

Awareness and Attitude Towards Tobacco Products and Tobacco Industry and Perception about Government's Role in Tobacco Control among the Adult Rural Population: A Cross-sectional Study in the Indian State of Bihar.

Bijaya Nanda Naik, Rajath Rao Ur, Manisha Verma, Santosh Kumar Nirala, Sanjay Pandey, C M Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bijaya Nanda NaikDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-0613
Rajath Rao UrDepartment of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7575-1162
Manisha VermaDepartment of Community Medicine, NAMO Medical Education and Research Institute, Silvassa, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-5340
Santosh Kumar NiralaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-9470
Sanjay PandeyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-6763
C M SinghDr. RML Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5568-7036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attitudes and impressions toward the tobacco industry and tobacco products among the general public are important determinants for curbing the menace of the tobacco epidemic. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the knowledge and perceptions about the tobacco industry and tobacco products and analyze attitudes towards social denormalization (SD) of tobacco use and tobacco industry denormalization (TID) among the rural population of Bihar, India. Methods: This community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted on 421 adults aged 18 to 65 years who were selected using multistage systematic random sampling in a rural area of Bihar State in India from January to March 2022. Results were presented as proportions and the factors associated with support for TID and SD were identified using the chi-square test and binary logistic regression. Findings: Out of 421 participants, 342 (81.2%) did not consider smokeless tobacco to be very dangerous. Nearly half (192, 45.6%) of the individuals believed that tobacco companies never tell the truth about the ill effects of tobacco use on health. Maximum, 345 (89.5%) also believed that the tobacco industry is responsible for adverse health effects of tobacco use and that the government should sue them. The prevalence of favorable attitudes toward TID and SD was found to be 55.1% [95% CI: 50.3% - 59.8%] and 38.2% [95% CI: 33.7% - 42.9%], respectively. Conclusion: One out of every two and one out of every three individuals showed favorable attitudes toward TID and SD, respectively. There is a need to inform and educate the public on the ill effects of tobacco and the deceptive strategies used by the tobacco industry to help them choose health over tobacco.

Indexed as

GovernmentHealth attitudeSmokeless tobaccoTobacco industryTobacco use

Identifiers

PMID39051034
PMCPMC11264484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.