Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051020›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Evaluating a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Insert as Adjunctive Therapy for Inflammation and Pain Post-Corneal Transplantation.

Hasan Alsetri, Nicole Fram, Orly Shiler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05626478 (Assessing eFficacy and Safety of DEXTENZA 0.4 mg inseRt in Conjunction With Topical Drop Regimen Treating Pain and inflamMation Following Cataract Surgery Compared to SOC Topical Drop Regimen), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05626478 phase4completednot on this map

Assessing eFficacy and Safety of DEXTENZA 0.4 mg inseRt in Conjunction With Topical Drop Regimen Treating Pain and inflamMation Following Cataract Surgery Compared to SOC Topical Drop Regimen

TypeinterventionalSponsorNicole Fram M.D.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsCorneal Edema, Corneal Defect, Anterior Chamber Inflammation, Ocular PainArmsDextenza 0.4Mg Ophthalmic Insert, Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp, Prolensa 0.07% Ophthalmic Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hasan AlsetriWeill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Nicole FramAdvanced Vision Care, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7170-8685
Orly ShilerAdvanced Vision Care, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5015-2008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the efficiency and safety of an intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (Dextenza, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc) supplemented with a reduced-frequency topical drop regimen in mitigating pain and inflammation post-penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), compared to standard topical corticosteroid therapy. Patients and Methods: Eyes were categorized within the DSEK, DMEK, or PKP groups based on ocular characteristics and surgical indications. Randomized in a 1:1 ratio, the intervention group received Dextenza alongside a lowered drop frequency, while the control group followed a conventional drop protocol with no Dextenza. Primary outcomes included average pain scores and absence of anterior chamber cell and flare. Secondary outcomes included delayed re-epithelialization, corneal rejection episodes, instances of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation >10mmHg above baseline, cystoid macular edema (CME) occurrence, and the necessity for steroid rescue. Results: The study included 30 eyes (10 PKP, 10 DSEK, 10 DMEK). Mean pain scores (0-100 scale; (0-39 = mild pain, 40-69 = moderate pain, 70-100 = severe pain) in the Dextenza group were 3.6 (PKP), 12 (DSEK), 8 (DMEK), compared to 1.2 (PKP), 0 (DSEK), and 4 (DMEK) in controls. PKP control (n=5): 1 delayed re-epithelialization, 1 IOP elevation, 2 CME. DSEK control (n=5): 1 corneal rejection, 1 IOP elevation, 1 CME. DMEK control (n=5): 1 IOP elevation, 1 CME. DMEK Dextenza (n=5): 1 delayed re-epithelialization, 1 CME. No cases required steroid rescue, and no cell or flare was observed one-week post-surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in pain, delayed re-epithelialization, IOP elevation, corneal rejection, or CME between the Dextenza and control groups regardless of the type of corneal transplantation performed. Conclusion: Dextenza, when combined with a lower-frequency drop regimen, demonstrates a safety profile comparable to that of a traditional higher-frequency drop protocol in terms of pain management and the adverse events explored in this study, potentially enhancing postoperative drop adherence.

Indexed as

corneal transplantationDextenzaDMEKDSEKPKP

Identifiers

PMID39051020
PMCPMC11268718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.