Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39051019›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma/Ocular Hypertension: The Randomized Phase III PEONY Trial.

Tsing Hong Wang, Tin Aung, Da-Wen Lu, Ronnie George, Sirisha Senthil, Fenghe Lu, Noriko Odani-Kawabata, Ki Ho Park

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02981446 (A Phase III, Randomized, Observer-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multinational and Multicenter Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% Compared With Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension- PEONY Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02981446 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Observer-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multinational and Multicenter Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% Compared With Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension- PEONY Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanten Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled370ConditionsOpen Angle Glaucoma or Ocular HypertensionArmsDE-117, Latanoprost ophthalmic solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tsing Hong WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tin AungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Da-Wen LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ronnie GeorgeSankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
Sirisha SenthilVST Centre for Glaucoma Care, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, India.
Fenghe LuSanten Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Noriko Odani-KawabataSanten Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Ki Ho ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) 0.002% with latanoprost 0.005% once daily in Asian subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG)/ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: In this Phase III randomized, observer-masked, active-controlled, multinational trial (NCT02981446), subjects aged ≥18 years with OAG/OHT in both eyes and baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥22 mmHg and ≤34 mmHg were randomized 1:1 to OMDI or latanoprost. IOP was measured at 9AM, 1PM, and 5PM at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Non-inferiority of OMDI to latanoprost was tested for primary and key secondary endpoints. Results: Each group included 185 subjects. Mean diurnal IOP from baseline to month 3 was reduced 7.1 mmHg (28.8%) with OMDI and 7.8 mmHg (31.3%) with latanoprost, with the least-squares mean difference (OMDI minus latanoprost) being 0.6 mmHg (95% CI: 0.0, 1.2 mmHg; p = 0.0366), indicating non-inferiority. Mean IOP reductions at the nine timepoints were -5.8 to -7.3 mmHg (23.5-29.5%) for OMDI and -6.1 to -7.9 mmHg (24.3-31.7%) for latanoprost. Non-inferiority per FDA criteria was also met. Rates of all AEs, ocular AEs, and ocular AEs associated with treatment were 40.0%, 36.8%, and 23.2%, respectively, for OMDI and 29.7%, 21.1%, and 11.9%, respectively, for latanoprost. Conjunctival hyperemia rates were higher with OMDI than latanoprost (11.9% vs 5.4%). Most AEs were mild, with no serious ocular AEs. Conclusion: OMDI safely and effectively reduces IOP in Asian subjects with OAG/OHT, with mean diurnal IOP at Month 3 and per-timepoint IOP reductions non-inferior to those of latanoprost.

Indexed as

glaucomaintraocular pressurelatanoprostocular hypertensionomidenepag isopropyl

Identifiers

PMID39051019
PMCPMC11268578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.