Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050977›Full record

ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2024

Computer-Aided Intra-Operatory Positioning of an MRgHIFU Applicator Dedicated to Abdominal Thermal Therapy Using Particle Swarm Optimization.

Yacine M'Rad, Caecilia Charbonnier, Marcelo Elias de Oliveira, Pauline Coralie Guillemin, Lindsey Alexandra Crowe, Thibaud Kossler, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti, Sana Boudabbous, Alexis Ricoeur, Rares Salomir and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yacine M'RadUniversity of Geneva, Faculty of MedicineImage Guided Interventions Laboratory (GR-949) CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland.
Caecilia CharbonnierArtanimMedical Research Department 1217 Meyrin-Geneva Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7018-885X
Marcelo Elias de OliveiraArtanimMedical Research Department 1217 Meyrin-Geneva Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4856-0544
Pauline Coralie GuilleminUniversity of Geneva, Faculty of MedicineImage Guided Interventions Laboratory (GR-949) CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland.
Lindsey Alexandra CroweUniversity Hospitals of GenevaRadiology Department 1205 Geneva Switzerland.
Thibaud KosslerUniversity Hopsitals of GenevaOncology Department 1205 Geneva Switzerland.
Pierre-Alexandre PolettiUniversity Hospitals of GenevaRadiology Department 1205 Geneva Switzerland.
Sana BoudabbousUniversity of Geneva, Faculty of MedicineImage Guided Interventions Laboratory (GR-949) CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-4613
Alexis RicoeurUniversity of Geneva, Faculty of MedicineImage Guided Interventions Laboratory (GR-949) CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland.
Rares SalomirUniversity of Geneva, Faculty of MedicineImage Guided Interventions Laboratory (GR-949) CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland.
Orane LortonUniversity of Geneva, Faculty of MedicineImage Guided Interventions Laboratory (GR-949) CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6500-1093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransducer positioning for liver ablation by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) is challenging due to the presence of air-filled organs or bones on the beam path. This paper presents a software tool developed to optimize the positioning of a HIFU transducer dedicated to abdominal thermal therapy, to maximize the treatment's efficiency while minimizing the near-field risk.

methodsA software tool was developed to determine the theoretical optimal position (TOP) of the transducer based on the minimization of a cost function using the particle swarm optimization (PSO). After an initialization phase and a manual segmentation of the abdomen of 5 pigs, the program randomly generates particles with 2 degrees of freedom and iteratively minimizes the cost function of the particles considering 3 parameters weighted according to their criticality. New particles are generated around the best position obtained at the previous step and the process is repeated until the optimal position of the transducer is reached. MR imaging data from

resultsAs compared to the manual EP, the rotation difference with the TOP was on average -3.1 ± 7.1° and the distance difference was on average -7.1 ± 5.4 mm. The computational time to suggest the TOP was 20s. The software tool is modulable and demonstrated consistency and robustness when repeating the calculation and changing the initial position of the transducer.

Indexed as

Computer-aided positioningHIFU transducernear-field safetyparticle swarm optimization (PSO)thermal therapy

Identifiers

PMID39050977
PMCPMC11268946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.