ArticleEuropean urology open science2024
Navigating the Aftermath: A Comprehensive Scoping Review on Follow-up Strategies After Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Distal ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The Impact of II-look Ureteroscopy on Survival in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of EAU-YAU Urothelial Working Group.European urology open science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) can be managed efficiently and safely through kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) in selected patient groups. However, the most effective and efficient postoperative surveillance strategy remains undetermined. We aimed to provide a comprehensive synopsis of the follow-up strategies and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with UTUC treated by KSS. Methods: Following the systematic methodology outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted searches in four databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up until December 11, 2023. Key findings and limitations: A total of 3121 articles underwent screening, of which 19 were selected for inclusion in this review. The follow-up schedules after KSS exhibited considerable variability among the included studies. Diagnostic modalities employed consisted of computed tomography urography (present in 84% of protocols), X urography (21%), ultrasound (21%), thoracic imaging (26%), voided urine cytology (89%), selective upper tract cytology (5.3%), cystoscopy (84%), and ureterorenoscopy (53%) at varying frequencies. At 5 yr of follow-up, the reported recurrence-free survival rate ranged from 30% to 86%, overall survival was 50-92%, and metastasis-free survival was 77-90%. Conclusions and clinical implications: This review unveils significant heterogeneity in clinical practices and survival outcomes, indicating disparities between real-world approaches and guideline recommendations. The lack of consensus on follow-up schemes is evident, emphasising the necessity for future initiatives aimed at developing a comprehensive protocol. Patient summary: This review shows significant heterogeneity in follow-up strategies after kidney-sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A lack of evidence contributes to discrepancies between guidelines and real-world approaches. Thus, future endeavours should aim at establishing a comprehensive protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.