ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2024
We need to talk-how muscle stem cells communicate.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fibre-Enriched High-Carbohydrate (FEHC) Diet Modulates Inflammation Without Affecting Bone Health in Older Women With Obesity: A Randomised Clinical Trial.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Trial
- Article
- Mechanisms of Impaired Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Therapeutic Approaches in Aging and Chronic Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tenascin-C from the tissue microenvironment promotes muscle stem cell maintenance and function through Annexin A2.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Shining a Light on Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Red Photobiomodulation Boosts Myoblast Differentiation In Vitro.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
- The role of primary cilia in myoblast proliferation and cell cycle regulation during myogenesis.Cell structure and function · 2025Review
- Zika virus infection disturbs development of human muscle progenitor cells.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Analyzing Muscle Stem Cell Function Ex Vivo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Editorial: Stem cell therapy for hereditary neuromuscular diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle is one of the tissues with the highest ability to regenerate, a finely controlled process which is critically depending on muscle stem cells. Muscle stem cell functionality depends on intrinsic signaling pathways and interaction with their immediate niche. Upon injury quiescent muscle stem cells get activated, proliferate and fuse to form new myofibers, a process involving the interaction of multiple cell types in regenerating skeletal muscle. Receptors in muscle stem cells receive the respective signals through direct cell-cell interaction, signaling via secreted factors or cell-matrix interactions thereby regulating responses of muscle stem cells to external stimuli. Here, we discuss how muscle stem cells interact with their immediate niche focusing on how this controls their quiescence, activation and self-renewal and how these processes are altered in age and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.