Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050814›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Simon Parlow, Shannon M Fernando, Michael Pugliese, Danial Qureshi, Robert Talarico, Lee H Sterling, Sean van Diepen, Margaret S Herridge, Susanna Price, Daniel Brodie and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Management, Outcomes and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Simon ParlowCAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shannon M FernandoCAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Michael PuglieseClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Danial QureshiClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Robert TalaricoClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lee H SterlingCAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sean van DiepenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Margaret S HerridgeInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susanna PriceAdult Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, London, UK.
Daniel BrodieDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Eddy FanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel I McIsaacClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pietro Di SantoCAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Richard G JungCAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Arthur S SlutskyInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Damon C ScalesInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alain CombesSorbonne Université, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Benjamin HibbertCAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Peter TanuseputroClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rebecca MathewCAPITAL Research Group, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
LOTUS-ICU Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Despite this, little is known about associated cost. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health care costs and resource use associated with AMI-CS using administrative data from the province of Ontario, Canada. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with AMI-CS from April 2009 to March 2019. One-year costs following index admission were reported at an individual level. We used generalized linear models to identify factors associated with increased cost. We stratified patients by revascularization strategy to compare cost in each group and examined total cost at a patient level per individual fiscal year. Results: We included 9,789 consecutive patients with AMI-CS across 135 centers in Ontario (mean age 70.5 years; 67.7% male). Mortality in-hospital was 30.2%, and mortality at 2 years was 45.9%. The median inpatient cost per patient was $23,912 (IQR: $12,234-$41,833) with a median total 1-year cost of $37,913 (IQR: $20,113-$66,582). The median 1-year cost was $17,730 (IQR: $9,323-$38,379) for those who died in hospital, and $45,713 (IQR: $29,688-$77,683) for those surviving to discharge, with $12,719 (IQR: $4,262-$35,275) occurring after discharge. Patients who received coronary artery bypass grafting incurred the highest cost among revascularization groups. No significant differences were observed in cost per fiscal year from 2009 to 2019. Conclusions: AMI-CS is associated with significant health care costs, both during the index hospitalization and following discharge. To optimize cost-effectiveness, future therapies should aim to reduce disability in addition to improving mortality.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctioncardiogenic shockcritical carehealth care costresource utilization

Identifiers

PMID39050814
PMCPMC11268098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.