Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050775›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine reports2024

Relevance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Cancer: Detection of Underrated Psychological Distress of Palliative Care Patients in an Outpatient Setting.

Madeleine Fink, Sandy Müller, Eva Warnecke, Jörg Hense, Martin Schuler, Martin Teufel, Maria Rosa Salvador Comino, Mitra Tewes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madeleine FinkClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-0064
Sandy MüllerDepartment of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eva WarneckeDepartment of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jörg HenseDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin SchulerDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin TeufelClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Maria Rosa Salvador CominoDepartment of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mitra TewesDepartment of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The overall level of physical and psychological symptom burden of advanced cancer patients (ACP) in an outpatient setting is notoriously difficult to assess. Therefore, more efficient and objective assessment is needed to accomplish this important task. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the physical and psychological symptom burden rated by palliative care nurse (PCN) versus patient's self-rating. Design: This retrospective German cohort study analyzed symptom burden using an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM). After referral to an outpatient specialized palliative care team, a PCN assessed the patient's symptoms both up to three months before initial presentation (IP) and at IP.Group differences were identified using analyses of variance (ANOVA). Further descriptive analysis of patient characteristics was used. Subjects: The study enrolled 164 ACP who were referred to a specialized palliative care (SPC) team. Mean age was 62 (± 12.6) years. Gastrointestinal ( Results: Most frequent reasons for referral were pain ( Conclusion: ACP in an outpatient setting were more frequently referred to SPC for pain management and assistance with social problems with regard to the cancer and its limitations. Psychological distress was underrated by the PCN in comparison with patient self-reporting through ePROM. This underlines the importance of self-reported outcome measurement.

Indexed as

advanced cancerMinimal Documentation Systemoutpatientpalliative carepatient-reported outcome measurement

Identifiers

PMID39050775
PMCPMC11265614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.