Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050739›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2024

Registration of finger implants in the Dutch arthroplasty registry (LROI).

Esther van Santbrink, Antonius A van den Hurk, Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren, Juliette E Hommes, Rutger M Schols, Xavier H A Keuter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esther van SantbrinkDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Antonius A van den HurkDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Anneke Spekenbrink-SpoorenDutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Juliette E HommesDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Rutger M ScholsDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Xavier H A KeuterDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finger arthroplasty is commonly used to treat pain in the finger joints due to osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Despite the procedure having existed for a relatively long time, it is still unknown which characteristics influence implant survival. The Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (LROI) is one of the 4 registries worldwide registering finger arthroplasties. This study aimed to investigate impact factors for implant survival regarding finger joint arthroplasty and assess registration completeness using the national healthcare claims database to compare. A total of 951 primary arthroplasties and 84 revision arthroplasties of the finger joints were registered. A higher likelihood of primary and revision surgery was found in female patients. The third and fourth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were the most frequently operated in primary surgery; however, the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were the most frequently revised joints. Silicone implants were used in most cases and evenly throughout all digits. Suboptimal registration completeness was shown for plastic surgeons with just 35.5%-37.4% of all surgeries registered. Although orthopedic surgeons do not perform most surgeries on the hand, they registered 76.5%-78.2% of surgeries. No statistical analyses were justified, considering the low completeness and limited follow-up. Female gender and PIP joint disease are possible risk factors for primary arthroplasty. MCP arthroplasties showed higher revision rates. However, participation rates and, therefore, data completeness were not optimal. To optimize participation, improving ease of registration should be explored. Furthermore, we urge readers who deal with joint implants to register their surgeries in the LROI database because only optimal registration completeness leads to high-quality data.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty registryFinger arthroplastyImpact factorsObservational early outcomesOrthopedic and plastic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39050739
PMCPMC11266863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.