ReviewRoyal Society open science2024
The affinity-efficacy problem: an essential part of pharmacology education.
Review in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic Basis of Paton's Rate Theory of Drug Action: Occupation Theory as Its Steady-State Limit.Cureus · 2026Article
- Convergent mechanisms in Wnt and Hedgehog signaling.Science signaling · 2026Review
- Integrated Approaches in Drug Repositioning Highlight Ouabain and Helenalin as Potential Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Fibrosis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- The affinity-efficacy problem: an essential part of pharmacology education.Royal Society open science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fundamental mistake in receptor theory has led to an enduring misunderstanding of how to estimate the affinity and efficacy of an agonist. These properties are inextricably linked and cannot be easily separated in any case where the binding of a ligand induces a conformation change in its receptor. Consequently, binding curves and concentration-response relationships for receptor agonists have no straightforward interpretation. This problem-the affinity-efficacy problem-remains overlooked and misunderstood despite it being recognized in 1987. To avoid the further propagation of this misunderstanding, we propose in this review that the affinity-efficacy problem should be included in the core curricula for pharmacology undergraduates proposed by the British Pharmacological Society and the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.