Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050713›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Gender stereotypes regarding power and niceness in Japanese children.

Xianwei Meng, Mako Okanda, Yasuhiro Kanakogi, Moe Uragami, Hiroki Yamamoto, Yusuke Moriguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xianwei MengGraduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Mako OkandaGraduate School of Psychology, Otemon Gakuin University, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuhiro KanakogiGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Moe UragamiDepartment of Human Sciences, Sugiyama Jogakuen University, Nissin, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroki YamamotoGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1051-6599
Yusuke MoriguchiGraduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9002-7834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Belief in gendered social power imbalance (i.e. males are more powerful than females) leads to undesirable gender disparities, but little is known about the developmental origins of this belief, especially in Eastern cultures. We investigated the development onset of this belief by focusing on 4-7-year-old Japanese children while considering another belief (females are nicer than males) for comparison. In the dyadic context tasks, children saw pairs of animated characters depicting powerful-powerless or kind-unkind postures and judged the characters' gender (boy or girl). Results suggested both 'nice = female' and 'powerful = female' gender stereotypes in children. In the collective context tasks, children were presented with stories in occupational contexts, including multiple unspecified people and verbal cues, describing more explicitly the powerful and nice traits of the protagonists. The results replicated the 'nice = female' gender stereotype. Moreover, early 'powerful = male' gender stereotypes were seen in 6-year-old boys but not among girls in general. These findings demonstrate that Japanese children's beliefs regarding gender differences in power vary depending on the context in which male-female interactions are presented. Additionally, the study reveals that signs of the 'powerful = male' social power gender stereotype emerge around the age of 6.

Indexed as

beliefgender inequalitygender stereotypesocial developmentsocial power

Identifiers

PMID39050713
PMCPMC11265890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.