SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2024
Bifid triple viable preparation combined with enteral nutrition as a supportive treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Probiotics in epilepsy treatment: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The benefits and risks of bifid triple viable preparations in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are still controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bifid triple viable preparations in combination with enteral nutrition for the management of AIS. Methods: Eight public databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, VIP, WanFang, EBSCO, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant clinical literature, published through January 2024. These data were then used in the present meta-analysis. Results: A total of 15 studies involving 1,544 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In terms of nutritional status, the results showed that compared with enteral nutrition alone, the bifid triple viable preparation combination group increased the levels of total protein (mean difference [MD], 5.53; 95%confidence interval [CI], 1.94-9.12; Conclusion: The addition of bifid triple viable preparation to enteral nutrition improved the nutritional status, neurological function, intestinal barrier function, and immune function of patients with AIS, and reduced the risk of infection and gastrointestinal events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.