ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Administrative regulation-informed analysis of the developmental path of national volume-based procurement to improve drug accessibility in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The procurement of medicines via China's national volume-based procurement (NVBP) necessitates collaboration among various entities. This paper highlights the legal significance of the engagement of pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, and the National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA) in improving drug accessibility. Methods: We conducted a numerical simulation using MATLAB to develop an evolutionary game model involving these three participants in NVBP. Results: Our findings indicate that the final evolutionary stabilization strategies are pharmaceutical companies actively participating, hospitals using bid-winning medicines, and the NHSA implementing a low-intensity intervention. The study reveals that the evolutionary outcomes for hospitals and pharmaceutical companies are significantly affected by factors such as NHSA's subsidy level and pharmaceutical companies' level of participation. However, NHSA's decision-making process is less influenced by these factors. Discussion: From a legal perspective, the successful implementation of NVBP, ensuring fairness and legality, requires adherence to relevant policies and regulations. The NHSA should employ statutory incentives and regulatory methods in formulating and adjusting NVBP policy to enable pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, and the NHSA to exercise their rights rationally within the legal framework of the game process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.