ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Research progress on sexual functioning and associated factors in childhood cancer survivors: a scoping review.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Let's Talk About Sex: A Systematic Review of What Childhood Cancer Patients and Survivors Really Want to Know About Sex.Psycho-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Sexual Experience, Psychological Implications, and Typical Response Strategies Among Childhood Cancer Survivors With Sexual Dysfunction in China: A Qualitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Childhood Cancer Survivors (CCSs) are more likely to report sexual dysfunction than people without cancer history. Sexual functioning encompasses more than just sexual dysfunction. The scarcity of information regarding the status and influencing factors of sexual functioning in CCSs, hampers to devise suitable screening or interventions. This review aims to summarize research progress on sexual functioning and associated factors among CCSs. Methods: This review protocol is registered in PROSPERO(CRD42023427939) and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. From inception to November 15, 2023, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, CNKI Database, Wanfang of Chinese Database, SinoMed Database and Cochrane Library on sexual functioning and childhood cancer survivors. Inclusion criteria were English or Chinese studies focusing on sexual functioning and related factors of cancer survivors, who diagnosed with cancer before 18 years old, and were adult and disease-free when participating in the study. Studies were excluded if the focus was on adult cancer patients or without age information. Findings: 395 records were retrieved, and 22 studies were finally included in this review. Results suggest that CCSs experience a substantial burden of sexual issues, including delayed psychosexual development, low satisfaction, and high prevalence of dysfunction. Underlying factors related to sexual functioning of CCSs were identified, including demographic, cancer treatment-related, psychological, and physiological factors. The historical change in research on sexual functioning was summarized. Interpretation: Research on sexual functioning among CCSs is limited. The extent to which cancer and related treatments affect sexual functioning remains largely unknown. The relationships between various factors and mechanisms underlying sexual functioning need to be confirmed by more rigorous studies to enable effective interventions to be developed. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.