Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050556›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Comparison of early

Keiichi Tominaga, Mimari Kanazawa, Shoko Watanabe, Takanao Tanaka, Shunsuke Kojimahara, Satoshi Masuyama, Keiichiro Abe, Akira Kanamori, Akira Yamamiya, Takeshi Sugaya and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Keiichi TominagaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3716-3386
Mimari KanazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Shoko WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Takanao TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Shunsuke KojimaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Satoshi MasuyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Keiichiro AbeDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Akira KanamoriDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Akira YamamiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-5606
Takeshi SugayaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Kenichi GodaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Yuji FujitaDepartment of Pediatrics Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6440-9110
Shigemi YoshiharaDepartment of Pediatrics Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Yasuo HaruyamaIntegrated Research Faculty for Advanced Medical Sciences Dokkyo Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Atsushi IrisawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by repeated relapse and remission. Because no fundamental therapeutic strategy has been established, the treatment goal is generally to maintain the remission phase for a long period after rapid remission induction. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorption (GMA) for UC is reportedly quite safe because it does not affect immunosuppression. Moreover, it is useful in combination with other remission induction therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in efficacy by the timing of the addition of GMA with corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and anti-cytokine therapy for active UC. Methods: The study included 59 patients. Patients who started GMA of 5-11 days were in the early GMA combination group. Patients who started GMA 12 days or more were in the late GMA combination group. The primary endpoint was difference in the effect of additional GMA according to the timing of the intervention. The secondary endpoint was difference in the time to remission induction between the two groups. Results: Of the 32 early GMA group patients, 24 achieved remission induction. Of the 27 late group patients, 18 achieved remission induction. No significant difference in induction rates was found ( Conclusions: In conclusion, results suggest that early addition of GMA might lead to earlier remission in patients who have had an inadequate response to remission induction therapy with corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and anti-cytokine therapy.

Indexed as

granulocyte and monocyte adsorptionincompleteremission induction therapyulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39050556
PMCPMC11266777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.