ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Generative adversarial networks synthetic optical coherence tomography images as an education tool for image diagnosis of macular diseases: a randomized trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning ophthalmic anatomy with AI-generated visual resource: the moderating role of educational background.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The application of artificial intelligence-generated content in ophthalmology education.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of generative adversarial networks (GANs) in creating synthetic OCT images as an educational tool for teaching image diagnosis of macular diseases to medical students and ophthalmic residents. Methods: In this randomized trial, 20 fifth-year medical students and 20 ophthalmic residents were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) into Group real OCT and Group GANs OCT. All participants had a pretest to assess their educational background, followed by a 30-min smartphone-based education program using GANs or real OCT images for macular disease recognition training. Two additional tests were scheduled: one 5 min after the training to assess short-term performance, and another 1 week later to assess long-term performance. Scores and time consumption were recorded and compared. After all the tests, participants completed an anonymous subjective questionnaire. Results: Group GANs OCT scores increased from 80.0 (46.0 to 85.5) to 92.0 (81.0 to 95.5) 5 min after training ( Conclusion: The education tool using synthetic OCT images had a similar educational ability compared to that using real OCT images, which improved the interpretation ability of ophthalmic residents and medical students in both short-term and long-term performances. The smartphone-based educational tool could be widely promoted for educational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.