SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
The effectiveness of transnasal high flow nasal cannula in bronchoscopy under sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- High-flow nasal cannula for acute respiratory failure: a bibliometric analysis of current trends and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilation in Chinese patients undergoing bronchoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of nasal high-flow therapy versus standard oxygen therapy in hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTS.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus Venturi facemask in women with cardiovascular disease undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The Role of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) During Flexible Bronchoscopy in Adult Patients with Moderate Respiratory Dysfunctions: An Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- All India Difficult Airway Association 2025 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult airway in paediatrics under general anaesthesia.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Effects of high-flow oxygen therapy on oxygenation in dogs undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation reduces desaturation risk during diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy under deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical application effects of transnasal high flow nasal cannula compared to other conventional modalities for oxygen therapy devices in patients undergoing bronchoscopy. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in multiple English databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to collect relevant studies on the application of high flow nasal cannula in patients undergoing bronchoscopy, and conducted a meta-analysis utilizing RevMan 5.4 software, following the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included, involving 1,631 patients (HFNC group: Conclusion: When HFNC or NIV is utilized during the examination and treatment of bronchoscopy patients, both oxygenation modalities enhance oxygenation function and reduce the incidence of hypoxemia compared to conventional oxygen therapy. HFNC can be regarded as a viable alternative to NIV for specific high-risk patients undergoing bronchoscopy. It decreases the duration of bronchoscopy and improves the PaO Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier 1414374462@qq.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.