Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050530›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Protocol for a scoping review of traditional medicine research methods, methodologies, frameworks and strategies.

Nadine Ijaz, Jennifer Hunter, Suzanne Grant, Kate Templeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadine Ijaz *Department of Law and Legal Studies, Faculty of Public Affairs, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jennifer Hunter *Health Research Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Suzanne GrantNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Kate TemplemanHealth Research Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for the evidence-informed integration of traditional medicine (TM) into health systems. Research rigor requires a good "fit" between research designs and what is being studied. The expectation that TM research fully adheres to biomedical evidentiary norms potentially creates tensions, as TM paradigms have their own distinct features. A scoping review will be conducted to describe and characterize the research approaches used in TM and their paradigmatic alignment with the TM being studied. Methods: This scoping review protocol was informed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methods. This protocol outlines an Discussion: Aligned with the principle of Two-Eyed Seeing (

Indexed as

complementary therapiesresearch methodsresearch paradigmsscoping reviewtraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID39050530
PMCPMC11267516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.