ArticleHeliyon2024
Resolving conflict and promoting coordination for an integrated old-age healthcare service system in China: GMCR-AHP based decision analysis approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of the integration of medical and nursing care and its association with depression and anxiety among medical staff in the Jinhua area.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
China faces a healthcare challenge due to its aging population, necessitating an integrated old-age healthcare system considering multiple stakeholders' interests. Conflict and inequality may arise from varying stakeholder interests. This study develops a conflict resolution strategy for the coordination of stakeholders involved in the old-age healthcare service system, promoting harmonization and minimizing conflict to establish an equitable system meeting elderly needs. It contributes to a robust healthcare system for comprehensive, quality care. The focus of the study is to identify relevant stakeholders and decision-makers involved in developing an integrated old-age healthcare service system and explore a feasible solution through stakeholder analysis using the Mitchell score-based technique and stakeholder theory. Decision-makers' preferences are estimated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Solution strategies are developed through multiple stability concepts within the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR). The conflict resolution analysis based on the integrated AHP-GMCR approach reveals that the development of an integrated old-age healthcare system is feasible by addressing potential conflicts among the stakeholders. Considering the current predicament of comprehensive medical services in China, governments should distribute authority, simplify procedures, and improve the insurance system. Furthermore, medical institutions should explore funding options, expand services, and enhance accessibility. Elderly individuals should prioritize healthy aging and seek suitable healthcare providers. Stakeholder participation is crucial for effective implementation. These recommendations enable China to advance integrated elderly care successfully, addressing challenges posed by the aging population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.