ArticleHeliyon2024
Establishment of discrete reference interval and next-generation reference interval for copper and zinc during pregnancy using real-world data.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment and Temporal Validation of Next-Generation Reference Intervals for Routine Hematological Parameters Using Large-Scale Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Copper and zinc are two trace elements that are essential to maintain normal pregnancy and fetal development. But only few research established specific reference intervals (RIs) for pregnant women. In this study, we aim to establish discrete RIs and next-generation RIs for copper and zinc during pregnancy by real-world data. Method: We retrospectively collected 710 healthy pregnant women and 300 age-matched non-pregnant women attending the hospital and compared copper and zinc levels among them. Further, we analyzed multiple factors (gestational age, maternal age, and parity) that may affect copper and zinc during pregnancy by multivariate regression. Two types of reference intervals (RIs) of copper and zinc for pregnant women were established: discrete reference intervals (RIs) by non-parametric method and next-generation RIs by Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS) model. Result: Copper levels were higher (median: 1st trimester: 1203.00 μg/L, 2nd trimester: 1818.00 μg/L, 3rd trimester: 1795.00 μg/L) than in non-pregnant women (median: 900.00 μg/L, p＜0.001), whereas zinc levels were lower in pregnant women (median: 1st trimester: 836.00 μg/L, 2nd trimester: 639.00 μg/L, 3rd trimester: 618.00 μg/L) than in non-pregnant women (median: 767.00 μg/L, p＜0.001). Additionally, copper and zinc levels varied among trimesters. Moreover, copper and zinc were affected significantly by gestational age but maternal age only had a weak effect on them. Based on the effect of gestational age, we established discrete RIs partitioned by trimesters and next-generation RIs for copper and zinc respectively during pregnancy. Conclusion: Taken together, this research elucidated the remarkable effect of gestational age on copper and zinc during pregnancy. The next-generation RIs visualized trends and subtle changes in copper and zinc levels during pregnancy. The discrepancy between discrete RIs and next-generation RIs suggested a more detailed continuous RIs could be considered for pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.