Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39050418›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Deactivation and collective phasic muscular tuning for pointing direction: Insights from machine learning.

Florian Chambellant, Jeremie Gaveau, Charalambos Papaxanthis, Elizabeth Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Florian ChambellantUniversité de Bourgogne, INSERMU1093, France.
Jeremie GaveauUniversité de Bourgogne, INSERMU1093, France.
Charalambos PapaxanthisUniversité de Bourgogne, INSERMU1093, France.
Elizabeth ThomasUniversité de Bourgogne, INSERMU1093, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arm movements in our daily lives have to be adjusted for several factors in response to the demands of the environment, for example, speed, direction or distance. Previous research has shown that arm movement kinematics is optimally tuned to take advantage of gravity effects and minimize muscle effort in various pointing directions and gravity contexts. Here we build upon these results and focus on muscular adjustments. We used Machine Learning to analyze the ensemble activities of multiple muscles recorded during pointing in various directions. The advantage of such a technique would be the observation of patterns in collective muscular activity that may not be noticed using univariate statistics. By providing an index of multimuscle activity, the Machine Learning (ML) analysis brought to light several features of tuning for pointing direction. In attempting to trace tuning curves, all comparisons were done with respects to pointing in the horizontal, gravity free plane. We demonstrated that tuning for direction does not take place in a uniform fashion but in a modular manner in which some muscle groups play a primary role. The antigravity muscles were more finely tuned to pointing direction than the gravity muscles. Of note, was their tuning during the first half of downward pointing. As the antigravity muscles were deactivated during this phase, it supported the idea that deactivation is not an on-off function but is tuned to pointing direction. Further support for the tuning of the negative portions of the phasic EMG was provided by the observation of progressively improving classification accuracies with increasing angular distance from the horizontal. We also demonstrated that the durations of these negative phases, without information on their amplitudes, is tuned to pointing directions. Overall, these results show that the motor system tunes muscle commands to exploit gravity effects and reduce muscular effort. It quantitatively demonstrates that phasic EMG negativity is an essential feature of muscle control. The ML analysis was done using Linear Discriminant analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). The two led to the same conclusions concerning the movements being investigated, hence showing that the former, computationally inexpensive technique is a viable tool for regular investigation of motor control.

Identifiers

PMID39050418
PMCPMC11268187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.