ArticleCureus2024
Alcohol-Intoxicated Patients With Blunt Trauma and Head Injuries Have Better Outcomes Than Sober Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough alcohol-intoxicated patients have difficulties evaluating their consciousness level and being transported prehospital, there is some evidence that the survival outcomes for alcohol-intoxicated patients with head injuries are better. The present study evaluated whether the survival and brain function outcomes in alcohol-intoxicated trauma patients with head injuries were better than those in sober patients using the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB), a nationwide trauma registry in Japan.
methodsThe 17,823 patients with blunt trauma, including head injuries, who were registered in the JTDB database between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were performed for in-hospital survival in patients with blunt trauma, including those with head injuries, and for good brain function based on the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) in patients with only head injuries. Survival rates by head injury score using the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) 2008 or injury severity score (ISS) categories were compared between drinking and nondrinking groups.
resultsDrinking significantly affected survival (odds ratio 1.800, p<0.001) and good brain function (odds ratio 1.546, p<0.001), as indicated by logistic regression analysis using head injuries alone or blunt multisite trauma (including head injuries), respectively. According to analyses by the ISS category or head AIS score, there were significant differences between the drinking and non-drinking groups in several categories (ISS 9-15, 16-24, and 25-40 and AIS 3 and 5) regarding survival rates with blunt trauma, including head injuries, or good GOS rates with head injuries alone.
conclusionsThe survival rates for blunt trauma, including head injuries, and the prognosis for brain function based on the GOS were better in the drinking group than in the control group for cases with head injuries alone. A multivariate analysis also showed that alcohol consumption was significantly associated with better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.